Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
|
program [2011/08/16 15:22] pmuller [Oral presentations] |
program [2011/09/22 16:15] (current) clerger |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| | 11h | R. Fernández | L. Danlos & O. Rambow| N. Asher et al. | | | 11h | R. Fernández | L. Danlos & O. Rambow| N. Asher et al. | | ||
| | 11h45 |K. Jasinskaja & E. Karagjosova |M. Vergez-Couret et al. |N. Van der Vliet & G. Redeker | | | 11h45 |K. Jasinskaja & E. Karagjosova |M. Vergez-Couret et al. |N. Van der Vliet & G. Redeker | | ||
| - | | 12h30 | **Lunch** |** Lunch** | **Closure & Lunch** | | + | | 12h15 | **Lunch** |** Lunch** | **Closure & Lunch** | |
| | 14h | A. Tantos |M. Egg | | | | 14h | A. Tantos |M. Egg | | | ||
| | 14h45 | L. Vieu | **Poster Session**: \\ K. Alahverdzhieva & A. Lascarides, \\ A. Gazdik & G. Winterstein, \\ L. Mayol & E. Castroviejo \\ C. Roze \\ M. Gylling & I. Korzen | | | | 14h45 | L. Vieu | **Poster Session**: \\ K. Alahverdzhieva & A. Lascarides, \\ A. Gazdik & G. Winterstein, \\ L. Mayol & E. Castroviejo \\ C. Roze \\ M. Gylling & I. Korzen | | | ||
| Line 165: | Line 165: | ||
| ===== Oral presentations ===== | ===== Oral presentations ===== | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| - | **[[http://www.let.rug.nl/~vandervliet/|Nynke Van Der Vliet]] and [[http://www.let.rug.nl/~redeker|Gisela Redeker]]** //Complex sentences as leaky units in discourse parsing// | + | **[[http://www.let.rug.nl/~vandervliet/|Nynke Van Der Vliet]] and [[http://www.let.rug.nl/~redeker|Gisela Redeker]]** //{{:cid2011_submission_2.pdf|Complex sentences as leaky units in discourse parsing}}// |
| Abstract: \\ | Abstract: \\ | ||
| Line 171: | Line 171: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| - | **[[http://www.angl.hu-berlin.de/faculty/egg|Markus Egg]].** //Discourse particles between cohesion and coherence// | + | **[[http://www.angl.hu-berlin.de/faculty/egg|Markus Egg]].** //{{:cid2011_submission_4.pdf|Discourse particles between cohesion and coherence}}// |
| Line 180: | Line 180: | ||
| - | ** [[http://www.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~jasinsk/|Katja Jasinskaja]] and Elena Karagjosova.** //Elaboration and Explanation// | + | ** [[http://www.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~jasinsk/|Katja Jasinskaja]] and Elena Karagjosova.** //{{:cid2011_submission_8.pdf|Elaboration and Explanation}}// |
| Abstract:\\ | Abstract:\\ | ||
| Line 186: | Line 186: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| - | ** [[http://www.irit.fr/~Nicholas.Asher|Nicholas Asher]], Antoine Venant, [[http://www.irit.fr/~Philippe.Muller/|Philippe Muller]] and [[http://www.irit.fr/-Annuaire-?code=6334|Stergos Afantenos]].** //Complex discourse units and their semantics// | + | ** [[http://www.irit.fr/~Nicholas.Asher|Nicholas Asher]], Antoine Venant, [[http://www.irit.fr/~Philippe.Muller/|Philippe Muller]] and [[http://www.irit.fr/-Annuaire-?code=6334|Stergos Afantenos]].** //{{:cid2011_submission_9.pdf|Complex discourse units and their semantics}}// |
| Abstract:\\ | Abstract:\\ | ||
| Line 192: | Line 192: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| - | ** Julie Hunter.** //`Now': A Discourse-Based Theory// | + | ** Julie Hunter.** //{{:cid2011_submission_10.pdf|`Now': A Discourse-Based Theory}}// |
| Abstract:\\ | Abstract:\\ | ||
| Line 199: | Line 199: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| - | ** [[http://staff.science.uva.nl/~raquel|Raquel Fernández]].** //Incremental Resolution of Relative Adjectives: A DRT-based Approach// | + | ** [[http://staff.science.uva.nl/~raquel|Raquel Fernández]].** //{{:cid2011_submission_13.pdf|Incremental Resolution of Relative Adjectives: A DRT-based Approach}}// |
| Abstract:\\ | Abstract:\\ | ||
| Line 205: | Line 205: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| - | ** [[http://www.labri.fr/perso/moot|Richard Moot]], Laurent Prévot and [[http://www.labri.fr/perso/retore|Christian Retore]].** //Discursive analysis of itineraries in an historical and regional corpus of travels: syntax, semantics, and pragmatics in a unified type theoretical framework// | + | ** [[http://www.labri.fr/perso/moot|Richard Moot]], Laurent Prévot and [[http://www.labri.fr/perso/retore|Christian Retore]].** //{{:cid2011_submission_16.pdf|Discursive analysis of itineraries in an historical and regional corpus of travels: syntax, semantics, and pragmatics in a unified type theoretical framework}}// |
| Abstract:\\ | Abstract:\\ | ||
| Line 212: | Line 212: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| - | ** [[http://www.linguist.univ-paris-diderot.fr/~danlos/|Laurence Danlos]] and Owen Rambow.** //Discourse Relations and Propositional Attitudes// | + | ** [[http://www.linguist.univ-paris-diderot.fr/~danlos/|Laurence Danlos]] and Owen Rambow.** //{{:cid2011_submission_21.pdf|Discourse Relations and Propositional Attitudes}}// |
| Abstract:\\ | Abstract:\\ | ||
| Line 219: | Line 219: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| - | ** [[http://www.irit.fr/~Laure.Vieu|Laure Vieu]].** //On the Semantics of Discourse Relations// | + | ** [[http://www.irit.fr/~Laure.Vieu|Laure Vieu]].** //{{:cid2011_submission_23.pdf|On the Semantics of Discourse Relations}}// |
| Abstract:\\ | Abstract:\\ | ||
| - | I reconsider in this paper the semantics schemata given for veridical discourse relations in SDRT. I claim that for different reasons, structural and semantics, one cannot reduce discourse relations to their semantic effects. I propose a revised schema involving public commitment operators to characterize the rhetorical import of discourse relations. | + | In this paper, I examine the division of labour between discourse semantics and information packaging and reconsider the schemata for the semantics of veridical discourse relations given in SDRT. On |
| + | the basis of studies of the phenomena of discourse relation blocking, I claim that one cannot reduce the semantics of discourse relations to their content-level semantic effects. I propose revised semantic schemata involving public commitment operators to characterize the rhetorical import of discourse relations within their semantics. | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| - | ** Alexandros Tantos.** //Discourse Constraints of Clitic Left Dislocation in Modern Greek// | + | ** Alexandros Tantos.** //{{:cid2011_submission_24.pdf|Discourse Constraints of Clitic Left Dislocation in Modern Greek}}// |
| Abstract:\\ | Abstract:\\ | ||
| Line 231: | Line 232: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| - | ** Marianne Vergez-Couret, Myriam Bras, Laurent Prévot, Laure Vieu and Caroline Attalah** //Discourse contribution of Enumerative Structures involving pour deux raisons// | + | ** Marianne Vergez-Couret, Myriam Bras, Laurent Prévot, Laure Vieu and Caroline Attalah** //{{:cid2011_submission_25.pdf|Discourse contribution of Enumerative Structures involving pour deux raisons}}// |
| Abstract:\\ | Abstract:\\ | ||
| - | Description of discourse structure is a major topic of ongoing research (Moore & Wiemer-Hastings, 2003; Péry-Woodley & Scott, 2006). The importance of the discourse level (Asher & Lascarides, 2003; Grosz & Sidner, 1986; Hobbs, 1990; Mann & Thompson, 1987) is commonly accepted but the exact nature of its contribution and the rules that govern the interpretation are still debated. We would like to pay particular attention to enumerative structures as a textual pattern that constrain, in some way, their interpretation and their treatment in the SDRT model (Asher & Lascarides, 2003). Following Bras et al’s (2008) proposition to introduce a new textual discourse relation, Enumeration, we would like to go into this solution in depth in order to question its relevance. In brief, is the Enumeration relation necessary to construe the right representation of texts containing enumerative structures? To suggest possible answers to this question, we will consider discourse segments including the prepositional phrase pour deux raisons (for two reasons) in order to examine its relations with subsequent segments. | + | We propose to study the discourse contribution of enumerative |
| + | structures involving the prepositional phrase pour deux raisons. We would like | ||
| + | to highlight the contribution of the textual information conveyed by | ||
| + | enumerative structures and the prepositional phrase both to the discourse | ||
| + | structure and the discourse content within the SDRT model. We will show that | ||
| + | prepositional phrase like pour deux raisons must introduce a discourse | ||
| + | constituent in the structure attached by the Commentary relation to the left | ||
| + | context and the Enumeration relation to the right context. Finally we propose to | ||
| + | treat pour deux raisons as a new kind of discourse marker: We will show that | ||
| + | its discursive role within enumerative structures is to signal the content-level | ||
| + | relation Explanation. | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| Line 242: | Line 253: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| - | ** [[http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/s0896251/|Katya Alahverdzhieva]] and [[http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/alex|Alex Lascarides]].** //Semantic Composition of Multimodal Communicative Actions in Constraint-based Grammars// | + | ** [[http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/s0896251/|Katya Alahverdzhieva]] and [[http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/alex|Alex Lascarides]].** //{{:cid2011_submission_6.pdf|Semantic Composition of Multimodal Communicative Actions in Constraint-based Grammars}}// |
| Abstract:\\ | Abstract:\\ | ||
| Line 248: | Line 259: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| - | ** Laia Mayol and [[http://elena-castroviejo-miro.cat/|Elena Castroviejo]].** //The connective "doncs" in dialogue and the QUD// | + | ** Laia Mayol and [[http://elena-castroviejo-miro.cat/|Elena Castroviejo]].** //{{:cid2011_submission_12.pdf|The connective "doncs" in dialogue and the QUD}}// |
| Abstract:\\ | Abstract:\\ | ||
| Line 254: | Line 265: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| - | ** [[http://www.llf.cnrs.fr/Gens/Gazdik/index-fr.php|Anna Gazdik]] and [[http://www.linguist.jussieu.fr/~gwinterstein/|Grégoire Winterstein]].** //A Discursive Approach to Discourse Functions in Hungarian// | + | ** [[http://www.llf.cnrs.fr/Gens/Gazdik/index-fr.php|Anna Gazdik]] and [[http://www.linguist.jussieu.fr/~gwinterstein/|Grégoire Winterstein]].** //{{:cid2011_submission_17.pdf|A Discursive Approach to Discourse Functions in Hungarian}}// |
| Abstract:\\ | Abstract:\\ | ||
| Line 261: | Line 272: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| - | ** [[http://www.linguist.univ-paris-diderot.fr/~croze/|Charlotte Roze]].** //Towards a Discourse Relation Algebra for Comparing Discourse Structures// | + | ** [[http://www.linguist.univ-paris-diderot.fr/~croze/|Charlotte Roze]].** //{{:cid2011_submission_20.pdf|Towards a Discourse Relation Algebra for Comparing Discourse Structures}}// |
| Abstract:\\ | Abstract:\\ | ||
| Line 267: | Line 278: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| - | ** [[http://uk.cbs.dk/staff/mgj|Morten Gylling]] and [[http://uk.cbs.dk/staff/iorn.korzen|Iørn Korzen]].** //Discourse Constraints in a Cross-linguistic Typological Perspective// | + | ** [[http://uk.cbs.dk/staff/mgj|Morten Gylling]] and [[http://uk.cbs.dk/staff/iorn.korzen|Iørn Korzen]].** //{{:cid2011_submission_7.pdf|Discourse Constraints in a Cross-linguistic Typological Perspective}}// |
| Abstract:\\ | Abstract:\\ | ||